|
||||||
|
|
|
Jury Gives Addison Death
By Ellen Grimm on Thursday, December 18, 2008.
A Hillsborough County jury has sentenced Michael Addison to death for the 2006 murder of Manchester Police Officer Michael Briggs. NHPR Correspondent Ellen Grimm has been following the trial and has this report. 28 year old Michael Addison did not appear to react as the verdict was read. He kept his head back slightly as each juror individually confirmed the decision. Maryanne Briggs, Officer Michael Briggs’ mother appeared to wipe away tears in the packed courtroom. She had attended the trial everyday. And after the verdict she addressed the media. BRIGGS: My family is just just so happy. And this is all for Mike. Let us not forget Michael, Officer Michael Briggs. It's all for Michael. Justice has been done. Her husband, Lee Briggs, said he hoped the verdict would deter anyone from hurting police officers. Lee Briggs: My son is looking down saying that you did a good job, Dad -- and everybody. Okay? The jury -- six men and six women -- deliberated for about 13 hours over three days. The state argued that Addison was responsible for his decisions and that he had led a life a crime before killing Michael Briggs. In arriving at the death sentence, the jury unanimously found that the aggravating factors had outweighed those in favor of life in prison. Attorney General Kelley Ayotte: AYOTTE: I think this verdict sends a strong message that the people of NH support law enforcement and recognize the difficult and dangerous job that they do every day, going out to protect each of us. I also hope this verdict sends a strong message of deterrence to other criminals, that if you harm a police officer, that the state of NH is going to seek the harshest penalties available under our law. Briggs's bike patrol partner Officer John Breckinridge was on the scene when Briggs was shot. Breckinridge praised the verdict and said he hoped it would bring some closure to Briggs's family. Breckinridge: I think the verdict from the jury, the conviction for the charge, was the big one, because to me that validated Mike's life. And I think the penalty was kind of secondary. I don't know, maybe I'm shallow. I'm real happy with it. But it is what it is. Manchester police chief David Mara called the jury's decision just. MARA: He got nine weeks to have a jury deliberate whether or not he should have a death sentence. Michael Briggs didn't get that. He was just doing his job. He didn't get that same courtesy, that same opportunity. And as a result, his family also got a sentence; they got a sentence of life without a father, life without a brother, life without a son, life without a husband. In Concord, Governor John Lynch also called the verdict a just one. And he added that capital murder is an appropriate charge for, in his words, such a heinous and cowardly crime. But Bishop John McCormack, with the Manchester Catholic Diocese, released a statement saying Addison should not be executed but should spend the rest of his life in prison. After the verdict, Defense attorney Richard Guerriero, looking somber, spoke briefly to the press. Guerriero: Obviously we're very disappointed in the jury's verdict. However, we continue to believe that the objections we made before the trial regarding this process are valid, especially objections regarding the location of the trial and the comparison of this case to other cases. We will pursue those objections on appeal. We continue to believe that the death penalty is wrong. And we'll continue to fight against it. The defense had argued that Addison could not get a fair trial in Manchester for several reasons. One was due to the strong feelings in the city in support of Briggs and against Addison. The other was due to the lack of racial diversity among the jury pool. It has been about 70 years since the state of New Hampshire has put anyone to death. On Monday, Judge Kathleen McGuire is scheduled to formally announce that Michael Addison could be next. For NHPR News, I'm Ellen Grimm. comments
All comments are moderated before appearing on the site. Comments must adhere to the NHPR.org comment guidelines and terms of use. |
Support FromHighlights |
The hype on the Michael Addison trial has disturbed me -- totally disproportionate and overblown.
Murder is an irredeemably terrible crime. But in the Addison case there were not even the aggravating factors as with so many other more gruesome murders -- kidpnapping, false imprisonment, torture, mutilation, etc.
Even the level of intentionality has been noted to be significantly lower than in other murders.
So why has Addison merited the unprecedented attention and the death penalty, when far more aggravated murders do not?
I know this is not gonna meet a favorable reception, but I gotta say it: New Hampshire inordinately idolizes law enforcement. The same crime committed against an ordinary citizen would no way have incurred a sentence even remotely in the same league. I don't even need to go to the race issue, because I believe the gross disproportion is explained entirely in terms of the idolatrous position in which law enforcement is held in this state.
There is a gross imbalance here. Justice has not been done.